User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/2.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Seznam Browser 2.0Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 2.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.12101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2272closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 43.0.2272.76Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:35 | by ThaDafinser