User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Maxthon/3.0 Chrome/18.0.966.0 Safari/535.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
Maxthon 3.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 3.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.966.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 3.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.966.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.966closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 3.0WebKit 535.12Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 3Webkit 535.12Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.966.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:35 | by ThaDafinser