User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 P03D(c500;TB;W24H16)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoP03D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMoP-03Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoP03Dfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoP03Dcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
P03Dcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PanasonicP03Dmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo P03Dcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoP-03DFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:34 | by ThaDafinser