User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-cn; SCH-I829 Build JZO54K) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Android Browser Android 4.1.2WebKit SamsungGALAXY Style Duossmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Style Duossmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSCH-I829closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Style Duosmobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:34 | by ThaDafinser