User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; ABrowse 0.6; Syllable) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
ABrowse 0.6Syllable WebKit 420desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ABrowse 0.6closeSyllable desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ABrowse 0.6WebKit Syllable desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse 0.6closeSyllable closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 420 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ABrowse 0.6Webkit 420Syllable desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:34 | by ThaDafinser