User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; iris505) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 505 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux LavaIris 356mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 Android 4.2LavaIris 505smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 505closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko Android 4.2.2iris505mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:33 | by ThaDafinser