User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) (Atsameip FreeCrawl!)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
FreeCrawl Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.01Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.01closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.01Trident Windows 2000desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFreeCrawlclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.1Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0.1 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:33 | by ThaDafinser