User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; 2.3.4; en-us; DROID2 Build/4.5.1_57_DR4-52) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/533.1 MyDealerApp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaDROID2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.0WebKit GNU/Linux MotorolaDROID 2smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux MotorolaDROID2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.1Linux closeclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:32 | by ThaDafinser