User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; AP-705 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.81 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1764.90386
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 28.0Android 4.1unknown AssistantAP-705Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.1AssistantAP-705Tabletyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1764.90386closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 28.0.1764.90386closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.40404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1764.90386closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1764closeAndroid 4.1.1AssistantAP-705closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.10601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1764.90386WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.1.1AP-705tabletyescloseclose0.08001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1764.90386closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.09101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:32 | by ThaDafinser