User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; CROSS A28 Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
EvercossCross A28 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeChrome OS 25.0.1364.169closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4EvercossCross A28closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4CrossA28mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.0CrossA28Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:32 | by ThaDafinser