User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 [ja] (Playstation2; Linux 2.4.20 MIPS; ja-JP; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040630
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/sony.yaml
Gecko 1.8a2SonyPlaystation 2gaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8acloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.4.20closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.8a2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8a2Gecko 20040630Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.8a2 SonyPlaystation 2gaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:32 | by ThaDafinser