User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Linux Mint 16/Petra Firefox/25.0.1.
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 25.0.1Mint 16Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 25.0Gecko 25.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.09301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 25.0.1.closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 25.0.1.closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 25.0Gecko Mint 16desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 25.0.1.closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 25.0.1closeLinux Mint closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 25.0.1.closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 25.0.1Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 25.0.1Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 25.0.1.closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:32 | by ThaDafinser