User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-C360 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC360 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.35204 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Phantom 2.0close LGC360mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java LGC360smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGC360closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 531 LGLGC360closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGC360mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG-C360Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:31 | by ThaDafinser