User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Deepnet Explorer 1.5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Deepnet Explorer 1.5WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Deepnet Explorer 1.5Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Deepnet Explorer 1.5.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Deepnet Explorer 1.5 Windows XPdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Deepnet Explorer 1.5.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:31 | by ThaDafinser