User agent detail

Samsung GT-I9505 stagefright/1.2 (Linux;Android 4.4.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/mediaplayer.yml
Stagefright 1.2Android 4.4.2 SamsungGALAXY S4smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
stagefright 1.2WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Stagefright 1.2closeAndroid 4.4.2SamsungGalaxy S4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Stagefright 1.2 Android 4.4SamsungGALAXY S4smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2SamsungGT-I9505closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.4.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Stagefright 1.2 Android 4.4.2SamsungGalaxy S4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:31 | by ThaDafinser