User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; IM-A840SP Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechIM-A840SP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.1.2PantechIM-A840SPmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.1PantechIM-A840SPsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.1.2PantechIM-A840SPcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.1.2PantechVega S5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 29closeAndroid 4.1PantechIM-A840SPSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:31 | by ThaDafinser