User agent detail

GiONEE_TD500_CMCC/1.0 Android/2.3.7 (LinuxOS 2.6.35.7) Release/11.28.2011 Browser/WAP2.0 (UCWEB/7.9.3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
UC Browser 7.9Android 2.3.7 GioneeTD500mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GiONEE closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid GioneeTD500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3GioneeTD500 CMCCsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.7closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.3 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3.7GioneeTD500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.13701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3GioneeTD500Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:30 | by ThaDafinser