User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-G600-VODA/G600ACGJ1 NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-G600-VODA Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.09201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-G600-VODA G600ACGJ1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungSGH-G600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungSGH-G600smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH-G600-VODAcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungSGH-G600-VODAmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH-G600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:30 | by ThaDafinser