User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; MID9106CM Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.67495
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HenaMID9106CM Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.0.4HenaMID9106CMcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.67495WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.0.4MID9106CMtabletyescloseclose0.08901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:30 | by ThaDafinser