User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ230i/R5B TelecaBrowser/4.08
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ230i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 4.0 JAVA SonyEricssonJ230iMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ230i R5Bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 4.08close Sony EricssonJ230imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonJ230ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonJ230icloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J230icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 4.08 Sony EricssonJ230imobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ230iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:29 | by ThaDafinser