User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; SGP521 Build/17.1.1.A.0.402) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.4unknown SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.4.2SonySGP521closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.4.2SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyescloseclose0.054 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4SonySGP521Tabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:29 | by ThaDafinser