User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Slackware/Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 12.0.742.100Slackware WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 12.0WebKit Slackware desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 12.0.742closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 12.0.742.100WebKit 534.30Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 12Webkit 534.30Slackware desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 12.0.742.100closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:28 | by ThaDafinser