User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible;bingbot/2.0;+http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-461.php
yesBingBotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingBotBot/Crawler0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
bingbot 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBingclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesbingbotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBingbotCrawler0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingBot 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBingclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:28 | by ThaDafinser