User agent detail

MobilePlugin (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; samsung santos103gxx; JDQ39.P5200XXUAMI8)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungsantos103gxx Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MobilePlugin closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2Samsungsantos103gxx; JDQ39.P5200XXUAMI8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2Samsungsantos103gxxsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2Samsungsantos103gxxcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2Samsungsantos103gxx; JDQ39.P5200XXUAMI8mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.12701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:28 | by ThaDafinser