User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2; SEC_SC-03F) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2 Mobile Safari/537.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Tizen 2.2Webkit 537.3SamsungZeQmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung WebView 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.2closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.3Tizen 2.2SamsungZeQmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.2closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:28 | by ThaDafinser