User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; NetTAB THOR Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 YaBrowser/1.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
IconBITNetTAB THOR Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 1.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364closeAndroid 4.1.1IconBITNetTAB THORcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364.172WebKit 537.22Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 1.0Webkit 537.22Android 4.1.1IconBitNetTab Thortabletyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.1NetTABTHORTabletyesyescloseclose0.05401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:27 | by ThaDafinser