User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0(Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-la; htc kaiser) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.1.234 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCkaiser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 HTCkaisersmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.1close HTCkaisercloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.1.234 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTyTN IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:27 | by ThaDafinser