User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080219 Firefox/2.0.0.12 Navigator/9.0.0.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0Windows XPGecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0.6closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0.6closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 9.0.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 9.0.0.6closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0.6Gecko 20080219Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 9.0.0Gecko 1.8.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:27 | by ThaDafinser