User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; zh-CN; TM-5204 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.0.308 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.2Android 4.0unknown TeXetTM-5204Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 4.0TeXetTM-5204Mobile Phoneyesyes0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 4.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.4TexetTM-5204closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.4TM-5204mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:26 | by ThaDafinser