User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD i386; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Firefox 40.0NetBSD Gecko 40.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 40.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 40.0closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.17402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 40.0Gecko NetBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 40.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 40.0closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 40.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 40.0Gecko 20100101a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 40.0Gecko 40.0NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 40.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeNetBSD Desktopcloseclose0.08001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:26 | by ThaDafinser