User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-us ; IMO X2 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.2.3.162/145/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
IMOX2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android 2.3yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.3closeAndroid 2.3.6IMOX2closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.3.162WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6IMONormandy X2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.07801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:26 | by ThaDafinser