User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-A967/A967UCKH5 BMP/1.0.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLD-1.1 Opera/9.80 (BREW 5.0.4; Opera Mobi/BP96; U; en; SGH-A967/A967UCKH5) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-A967 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.1close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.1Presto Brew 1.0SamsungSGH-A967smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.1closeBREW 5.0.4SamsungSGH-A967closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.1Presto 2.5.28 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.1Presto 2.5.28Brew MP 5.0.4SamsungSGH-A967mobile:featureyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser