User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11; Gecko/20071129; Firefox/2.5.0) Maple 6.0.00067 Navi
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Gecko 1.8.1SamsungSmart TV 2011television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.5.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.5Gecko Windows Samsungtv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.5.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.5.0Gecko 20071129Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.8.1 SamsungSmart TV 2011televisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser