User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia203/20.26; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.5.0.34.15
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia203 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 1.5Gecko SymbianOS Nokia203Mobile Phoneyes0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.5Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia203smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 20.26;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.5.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia203closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.5.0.34.15Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 203closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.5.0Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 203mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.5closeNokia Series 40 NokiaAsha 203Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser