User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.7144/hifi/tmobile/at; Nokia 6085; de; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini 1.1 Nokia6085mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.7144closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto Symbian Nokia6085smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.7144closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.7144close Nokia6085closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.7144close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.7144 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 Nokia6085mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser