User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100222 Firefox/3.6 Kylo/0.6.1.70394
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Kylo 0.6.1.70394Windows XPGecko tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Kylo 0.6.1.70394closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Kylo 0.6Gecko Windows XPtv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6Gecko 20100222Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser