User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; SM-P602 Build/JSS15J) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSM-P602 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.3SamsungGALAXY Note 10.1" 2014 Editiontabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.3SamsungSM-P602closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.11501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy Note 10.1 (2014)tabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:25 | by ThaDafinser