User agent detail

Huaweisymantecspider (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Huaweisymantecspider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 5.1Huaweisymantecspidermobile-browseryescloseclose0.27803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Huaweisymantecspider closeWindows XP Huaweisymantecspidercloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesHuaweiSymantecSpiderCrawler0.041 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows XPHuaweisymantecspidermobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:24 | by ThaDafinser