User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ARIES_785 Build/GOCLEVER) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 25.0Android 4.2unknown GOCLEVERAries 785Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2GOCLEVERAries 785Tabletyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2GOCLEVERARIES 785smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.2ARIES_785closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.2ARIES_785tabletyescloseclose0.09601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.2GoCleverARIES 785Tabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:24 | by ThaDafinser