User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; Embedded Web Browser from: http://bsalsa.com/; RSScrawler/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0); .NET CLR 2.0.50727
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
RSScrawler 4.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesRSScrawlerclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.14001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:24 | by ThaDafinser