User agent detail

PhilipsK700/Obigo Browser 2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsK700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PhilipsK700 Obigocloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 2.0closeJVM PhilipsK700mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo 2 PhilipsK700smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close PhilipsK700closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 2.0 PhilipsK700mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close PhilipsK700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser