User agent detail

FlyCast/1.34 (BlackBerry; 8330/4.5.0.131 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/-1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
FlyCast 1.34BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerrysmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
BlackBerry RIM OS RIMBlackberryMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
FlyCast 1.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
FlyCast 1.34closeRIM OS media-playercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
FlyCast 1.34 BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerrysmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
BlackBerry 4.5.0.131closeBlackBerry closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBlackBerry OS BlackBerrycloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BlackBerry closeBlackBerryOS 4.5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BlackBerry Browser BlackBerry OS BlackBerryBlackBerrycloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FlyCast 1.34 BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerry Curve 8330mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser