User agent detail

SamsungI8910/SymbianOS/9.1 Series60/3.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Series60 3.0 SamsungOmnia HDmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.0SamsungOmnia HDmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows 7SamsungI8910smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeSymbianOS 9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.0SamsungOmnia HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser