User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; Avant TriCore) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.131 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-286.php
Avant 0.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser (Tri-Core) WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Avant Browser Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser