User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-cn; SCH-I959 Build JDQ39) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-I959 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY S4smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungSCH-I959closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy S4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser