User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Spotify/1.0.3.101 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Spotify 1.0.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.36closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Spotify 1.0.3closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.36Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:23 | by ThaDafinser