User agent detail

BIRD.Q168 UP.Browser/5.0.1.1.102 (GUI) UP.Link/4.2.1.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BirdQ168 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BIRD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.1.1.102close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 BirdQ168 UP.Browserfeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 5.0.1close BirdQ168closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.1.1.102 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 5.0 BirdQ168 UP.Browsermobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:22 | by ThaDafinser