User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.162 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Chrome 18OpenBSD Webkit 535.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit OpenBSD Desktop0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit OpenBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.162WebKit 535.19OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:21 | by ThaDafinser