User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.0.0/27.2354; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 240X320 Casio C781
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Opera Mini 6.0.0Brew Presto 2.8.119mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.0.0close KyoceraE4520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.0Presto Brew yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.0.0close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.0.0closeBREW closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.0.0Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.0.0Presto 2.8.119Brew mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.0close KyoceraE4520Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:21 | by ThaDafinser