User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; es-la; htc touch hd t8282) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/444/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCtouch hd t8282 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.10401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 HTCtouch hdsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close HTCtouch hd t8282closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTouch HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:21 | by ThaDafinser